The problem is that - just like pretty much everything in the suggestions forum - this is a subjective point of view. Disagreeing is a logical consequence resulting from that. For example:

That is not exactly "PvP to a higher level", I'd rather call it "a Player-versus-Anything match. A bit of PvP, and PvE to fill the gaps that remain". Whether this is good or bad, however, is rather subjective and I will therefore skip it in this evaluation.

Unless you want PvE to become the main aspect of SG the number of mobs would be severely limited. Considering how many crafting ingredients I find whenever I actually play SG, chests would most likely remain the primary source of such items.

If potions were removed from SG because they were breaking the game's balance, this change has most likely been well-thought-out. I am not convinced that undoing this change is a good idea; however, this point becomes irrelevant if brewing stands continue to be missing in SG.

 

Ah, okay. I believed brewing stands had been removed because it would have been easier to remove or at least caused an effect that does not depend on chest content.

 

Oh god no

 

When literally nobody is supporting a change besides the person who suggested it... it's pretty useless.

 

It's useless to waste time on a change nobody wants, lol

 

I can guarantee I have played MC more than you, played ECC more than you, and PVP'd more than you. Adding mobs would be useless because why would it be useful? You are saying for the unlikely change that a skeleton drops a bow it is useful? Bows can be found quite frequently if you just look in chests. Lol.

 

How do you know if it's going to be a good addition or not if you truly don't know the outcome of this change?

 

Is that necessarily a good thing?

Like @314 said above, letting players make potions was removed for a good reason.

 

-1

Since it would result from server LAG if there are many mobs that appear in the SG maps.