Minecraft Username:
CrazySwagMaster1
Reason:
"Attempted Scamming"

This rule states that I need to hold up my end of the deal in all trades, sales, etc. This rule applied to me when I had a trade sign that was selling for a higher rate than the advertised price. Although I did this unintentionally the rule still stands and I am aware I should be punished for it.
Counter-Reason:

This, I believe, more accurately describes my situation. Clause 2.2 states that if a scam was intended then it's bannable. I had no intention to scam. As mentioned previously (See "evidance" for a link to origional ban appeal), I had no intention to scam on the iron, gold, redstone, etc.

With the nstar sign, I am allowed to pick and choose the price at which I buy and sell things. The $500 for 6 is the price I chose. When dealing with the issue the first time, during my advertisement in trade where I was "buying n-stars for $500". The solution ended with @nicit6 telling me to cease any future advertisements, which I did. I did not know that he intended for me to remove the sign altogether The sign above it simply says you get $500. It does not say how many n-stars. I encourage all users to either ask questions or to read the trade sign at my shop.

I understand that attempts to scam users is wrong. I really do.

I also understand that I could have just as easily easily make a fake ban appeal, and lie about how I 'posted those signs up to try and scam users for 50 bucks.' I didn't. It was an honest mistake, and I'm sorry that it turned into this huge issue. It will not happen again.

Evidence (In chronological order)
Origional complaint against me for advertising $500 nstars.
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/user-complaint-crazyswagmaster1.99829/

Complaint that was filed against me for having false advertisements in-shop (Please read comments).
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/complaint-crazyswagmaster1.100455/

My first ban appeal, prior to this one (Please read comments in this as well).
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/ban-appeal.100483/

 

@12345shane, I had thought @nicit6 had already locked that previous ban appeal (He did now). I didn't realize it was still unlocked.