You have selective hearing...

 

may - (verb). expressing possibility

It isn't required.

 

Primzey! I was selling tp and he said ill tp then leave so I know you are not lying, so I let him tp and saying ok, you see it now plz go. He replied No noob I was /tpaccepted here and im not leaving and I didn't know what to do and know im here

 

im noob @ this site so if this was wrong place to complain I'm sorry and plz post MY complaint on the right place!

Thank You!

 

Please keep the topic revelant to the original post please.

 

since you seem to disagree with almost all counter arguements,

I may buy a plot.
may- I MIGHT buy a plot.

you dont seem to know the definitions.

 

No more point in countermarguements since you still seem to disagree and prove yourself again.

 

Jason has valid points, don't attack him on his disagreeing.

I myself think this should be required, it makes the appeal/complaints section much more structure and it makes things a little bit easier for staff. Although, I don't think the username should be necessary, because we can see who wrote the post. But a simple [complaint], [ban request] or [ban appeal] Would really help.

 

This is what my point was. The usernames shouldn't be required as long as they have a clear title that shows whether it is a complaint or a ban appeal.

 

The [Complaint] titles sure, but with the names..no. If it wasn't needed in the first place, I don't see why . A simple search or seeing what was written does the same thing.

"You may pull the lever when ready"
I read it as: You can pull the lever when ready. It's possible to pull the lever when ready.

But as the rules say: "may be posted" I don't see how this can be a command. It's a mere suggestion, an exhort. Two staff members have said its not necessary to post the name.

 

Please use the word "may" in a sentence where it implies that you MUST. Also, posting complaints shouldn't require a name. It's whether or not you're too lazy to read the complaint against the person.

And if you're going to post about how it's easier for other people to scroll down and see who has complaints, have you ever been told not to judge a book by its cover? It's the same thing here. Just because someone has a complaint against a specific person, it doesn't mean that person broke any rule. In fact, the person filing the complaint could simply be mad and wanted to try and get the person banned. You would need to read and look at the evidence before you decide to trust them or not, simply looking at the title of a complaint can not tell you whether they have really scammed.

 

No. If a dictionary definition had 5 meanings, it is not all 5 in context. Please explain how this context uses the command version? Why would andrew use a word that can cause confusion? It doesnt add up.

 

In the context he puts it, it doesn't mean it is required.