Ayy lmao

 

GG

 

I still think something like this would be a good compromise, and a good "freemium" strategy to tempt people to buy them as well

 

No -1

 

Why not?

 

1. It wouldnt really solve a problem. People would still have not sg kits most of the time. People would still be unhapy loosing to people with kits when they dont have one. In the end all this would just cause is more people running around with kits.
2. What kit are we giving them? Hunter so they can complain when they die to cc or buffer so the cc users start complaining about op non kitters with free kits that devalue their purchase.
3. People with kits would be unhappy and seeing as this doesnt solve a problem I see no reason to make them unhappy.

I dont like kits but this suggestion solves nothing.

 

I don't see enough players buying kits because of this to make it worth it. It might even enlighten them to the fact that just because they have a kit doesn't mean they are on the same playing field as someone with 3 kits and bffr.
All I see this suggestion doing is angering those who have purchased kits and dont feel like someone should get their kit without paying for it (despite the fact its on a cooldown) which is why I disagree with it.

 

I aprove this message +1

 

fixed it 4 u

 

I am aware of the meme, I approved this message nonetheless. Was a good use of meme

 

+1

 

+1, I really like this idea although I think this would only be a temporary fix... people would be happy for a while but once they get used to it they would start complaining again a month or so later. It would just go from 'kitters are too OP, they get a bunch of overpowered armor and weapons and we don't' to 'kitters are too OP, we only get to use kits once a day but they get to use kits all the time'.

 

I joined the server in early May, saw people getting money playing SG, played sg for a couple days and get destroyed by kits nonstop. got frustrated because the kits gave a substantial advantage went mining instead. never went back to SG.

From a newbie perspective, if builders-residents have no chance to win, they wont play. At least this suggestions puts it a step in the right direction.

 

To quote Jamie:

SG is dead. The more time we spend on it the less time we spend on advancing the servers.
Denied Sorry.