Hunger.

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by RazorRimz, Apr 27, 2014.

  1. RazorRimz

    RazorRimz Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,486
    Trophy Points:
    57,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +646
    Hello everyone. I have a suggestion for Andrew and the staff. Minecraft 1.7 has made hunger a killer for many, especially on sg where the chests you find might not provide you food for the whole game. I and many other ecocitycrafters hate this too. My suggestion to Andrew is to raise the food saturation by 20% to fix this problem. Who agrees with me?


    Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
     
  2. Harryhaz1

    Harryhaz1 RIP Lava sponge.
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    77,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,110
    nope, i don't think this is necessary at all, the way you're going at it, you may as well remove hunger at all, and health, and any other elements that may negatively impact on a player, the hunger is there for a reason, it adds another layer to the game, and i don't think that layer should be removed or decreased.

    furthermore, doing this will undermine the usefulness of donationfeatures such as feed(+) and kits such as scavenger and vsg

    (also, needs to be moved to suggestions)
     
  3. RazorRimz

    RazorRimz Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,486
    Trophy Points:
    57,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +646
    But I'm not asking to remove hunger, I'm asking to make the saturation back to the way it was in 1.6


    Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
     
  4. Harryhaz1

    Harryhaz1 RIP Lava sponge.
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    77,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,110
    but you're still reducing the effect that it has
     
  5. Revanrose6

    Revanrose6 Sith Lord
    ECC Sponsor Tycoon ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,419
    Trophy Points:
    97,160
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +3,334
    Moved to Suggestion
     
  6. RazorRimz

    RazorRimz Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2013
    Messages:
    1,486
    Trophy Points:
    57,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +646
    I'm technically not reducing the effect it has because it still had an effect before, it was just less annoying to players


    Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
     
  7. Harryhaz1

    Harryhaz1 RIP Lava sponge.
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    77,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,110
    That's the definition of reduction, diamonds used to be 200 dollars, pumpkins 3, should we return to that just because we can? Nodus used to be allowed, should be bring it back just because we can?

    Changes happen for a reason
     
  8. jhebert2012

    jhebert2012 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    417
    Trophy Points:
    31,390
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +190
    It's called the "Hunger Games" or "Survival Games", I think the point of the game is to try and survive the best you can with what you get....