Was that not a low-quality post?

 

It was not a post.

A post looks like this:


A children's game looks like this:


I fear for your ability to differentiate such simple things. Perhaps a trip back to preschool is in order?

 

Here is my low-quality post.

 

However, the joke is, low-quality post as in, stick of wood, and low-quality post as in, s***posting.

This is also, my low-quality post:

 

Other than the bugs on it, I don't see what is so low-quality about this post. It seems to be well intact, although it is not connected to anything else. I must disagree with you, as I rate this post a 5/10 overall.

This appears to be a flash game, not a post. In fact, the two are quite different. You might need to brush up on your skills on recognizing and thoughtfully discussing posts.

 

Sorry, but due to the uniqueness of this elderly post and the fact it has aged well I refuse to acknowledge it as a low-quality post. Not to mention that bottle cap is probably worth millions to some collector.
If you want a low-quality post, simply look behind and to the left of this post :p

 

You want a low quality post? This is my 3000th post. That's the lowest quality there is.

 

Obviously a low quality post, however, it is a high quality owl :p
[/IMG]

 

Here we observe the anatomy of a high quality post.

 

Only the lowest quality of posts for the lowest quality schools.

 

Rabbit kisses shows approval!

 

What saddens me the most are all the high-quality stories and characters that once came through this now low-quality post :(

 

What a shameful sight :(

 

NOT A SAMPLE

 

http://resonance-exhibition.co.uk/west-wittering-posts/

Moody posting.