[LWC removal] ReDnAx1991

Discussion in 'Historically Archived Staff Requests' started by ReDnAx1991, Apr 27, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ReDnAx1991

    ReDnAx1991 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    26,240
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +63
    1. What is your In-Game-Name? ReDnAx1991

    2. What town are the protections in? Spakenburg

    3. Are you the mayor or co-mayor? Mayor

    4. What are the co-ordinates of the protection: (DO NOT POST SCREENSHOTS, type them out please)


    itzdanielshd: Offline for too long

    X: 1687
    Y: 64
    Z: -5971


    Batss: Offline for too long

    X: 1631
    Y: 63
    Z: -5974

    Pigger_lord: Tried to sell him a house, he locked all kind of stuff (he was a noob so you don't have to bann him for the reckless thing he did)

    X: 1619
    Y: 63
    Z: -6022

    BanHammer278:

    X: 1611
    Y: 64
    Z: -6037

    Leticsmurf:

    X: 1690
    Y: 63
    Z: -5946

    5. Whos protections are these? (Use /cinfo to find out): See above

    6. What kind of protections are these? (doors, chests, signs etc.): All that is in the power of this application (please look everywhere).

    7. How many protections are we removing?: about 50

    8. Is this user banned from the server? If not, have you tried to contact them about removing their things? Look above for reasons

    9. Why do you want it gone/reasons?: I want to get room for new villagers
     
  2. generaljoecool

    generaljoecool Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,199
    Trophy Points:
    37,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +178
    Location one and two, found no locks on the houses at all, location three I cannot remove his locks. As he is an active user, please ask him to remove the locks, and if he refuses file a new lwc for his locks. Location four and five, removed all locks that I found.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.