Minecraft Name: stoler202 Suggestion: I suggest that if a complaint is handled it should say in the title [Guilty] or [Innocent] (It can happen!) Take a look at hacking complaints. many of them are filed yet some may be false. I don't say we should limit hacking complaints (or any other), but we should filter these. This would definitely help searching through a user's record. [EDIT]As @Vintage_Gamer said, perhaps this can be done with prefixes Reason: As said above it would make it easier to search through record. Any Other Information: N/A Link To This Plugin: N/A
This can be done with thread prefixes. Although, I don't think its needed, It makes no difference what the title says, because you still need to click and view the full thread for all the information.
Not everybody clicks on the full thing, and things, ahh he got a criminal record! And the prefixes could be nice.
+111 When it all comes down to it, I want to know what happened to them. Dismissed = not enough evidence or not a crime Handled = warned, temban, some sort of punishment, but forgiven banned = "They are bad. They are now dead to us... until a successful appeal" A choice of 3 words that tell you everything one might need to know without reading the entire thread.
Yes, I like this. It would save a good while if you could just look at the title and see what happened
- 1 a terrible idea.. to brand someone guilty instantly creates distrust.. example a person gets a complant for scamming.. and its branded as guilty. nobody will trust that user even if it wasnt his fault.. he house burned down and he lost his computer. if a person is guilty of scamming hacking or any other rule breaking they would be banned.. and you can check on that user with /seen. thats all users really need to know. a user that has sucessflully appealed would not show up as banned anymore with /seen. but a quick check on the forums can tell you if they have been previously banned expecially with the new "handled" ban appeals section.. this suggestion is a grab at branding people for one time incidents.
The point of this suggestion, is the exact opposite. Adding a prefix will guarantee people know what happened in the complaint. If someone doesn't read the complaint, he thinks he is a criminal, but a prefix would make sure people know what happened.
if a person doesnt read a complaint, then they are in the wrong on the situation. personally i have never judged a person on the amount of complaints. i do my judging on what the complaint was about. the prefix would just be a lazy mans excuse to see a person in a bad light.
