Minecraft Name:
SuburbSomeone

Suggestion:
I'm suggesting that we remove kits and by doing so, level the playing field in SG once and for all.

Reason:
Now that the EULA has taken effect, kits are no longer purchasable using USD. This, I would assume, would prevent Part 7 of the Sale and Refund Policy from taking effect. Here is the rule:

My suggestion is that we refund kit owners with ECD, and limit the window to be refunded to be at most two weeks. I personally would use a rate of $3,000/USD, which is two thirds of the feature rate under the booster. While this may be seen as shortchanging users, it limits the economic impact of removing kits, which is certainly massive no matter what (with 3k/usd, someone with all kits would get refunded $2,160,000).

Why would we remove kits, you ask? Because they are a deterrent to non-kitting players. You can tell simply by looking at the SG board that it's mostly a dead minigame. Double digit player counts are rare unless there is a boss battle or coupon SG. SG is something that not every single server has, but it's something that we can wear proudly and use to entice new users if we allow ourselves to make it fair for everyone. Rather than a new player complaining about SG, we can have one playing it instead. And the kit debate may be settled yet (though I'm sure it will rage on in the replies).

Any Other Information:
There would likely need to be a replacement booster for this - if possible, I'd like to see double item spawning in every chest. This would make games quicker and more dramatic, as users take longer than usual to loot chests and by the end are more likely to have someone on their tail after doing so. I guess people could brainstorm ideas, though maybe that's better suited for another thread.

Link To This Plugin/Is this a custom addition?:
It's removing things, so no.

 

Probably about 10 million. It's hard to say. $3,333 in kits would need to be refunded for it to hit 10 million, though.

 

You could always change your vote to "Sure, but I'm not with you on everything" :p

Why not David? Just curious

 

The former would probably anger @BackToThePast significantly - the latter would be nice but I don't know how kit users would feel about that.

 

That's longer than what I suggested :p

 

Can a mod remove the "leaning towards" options? I agree that 9 is a bit much.