Thank you, but I'm still going to argue for this suggestion. I am not entirely sure what you were referring to when you said was my opinion, but I'm gona assume you mean saying scamming can't be solved. If you think this isn't true then feel free to make a suggestion that would combat scamming if it gets implimented and it works it won't eradicate scamming completely. That being said as long as scamming exists and is an issue (which it currently is) there is still a need fo this suggestion, however if you find a way to eradicate scamming completely great job when/if that happens there will no longer be a need for this suggestion.
I see what you're saying here and I won't deny it could happen, but I wouldn't say it certainly will because this hopefully it would be made clear that there is a fairly small chance of getting your money back and this system isn't something they should rely on, however as I said this could happen. In the case that it does have the impacts you think it will only a small percent of people would think about it that way because most would know better.
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 19 of 30
-
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
1. you don't have to. dont play lotto when the tax is increased. problem solved.
2. I never stated that it would benefit the economy, simply the players. not sure if someone else has stated that.
3. we have tried fixing the problem many many times. we implemented contracts, we have released threads and wiki articles that educate players on how to prevent scamming, and we have introduced staff on how to oversee transactions. If you have further suggestions regarding prevention, again, make a new thread.
So people would be willing to lose money just in case they might get the same amount of money back? why wouldnt they just play lotto where they could make *more* then what they paid back? If this is implemented, players would only be refunded what they lost. for instance, say a player loans someone 100k with a 150k payback, and they are scammed. we would only give the 100k. they arent getting the rest back unless the scammer appeals. Not sure if that had been mentioned before.
again, if you have ideas regarding how to prevent scams, please make a new thread. that is not what this one is about. Also, you have not stated why you believe this suggestion is "ridiculous" except that you would prefer prevention to reimbursement. I see no cons except maybe that some people feel that players would be unfairly chosen to be reimbursed, and that some players are greedy and can't give up an extra $50 per ticket or not lotto for a whole day or one set of crazy lottos (10 lotteries). -
This is effectively a lottery for people that have been scammed...
A lottery to see who is actually going to be reimbursed for some other person who scammed them.
my main beef against this idea is that it is using server produced/collected funds to randomly payback someone that historically has never been reimbursed by anything remotely related to the server.
Following this line of possible logic, all lotto money should be collected and then reimbursed to all that have been scammed and can provide sufficient evidence. Do that, and then when the person invariably appeals and and invariably successful (because hey SCAMMERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!) they should be forced to pay back, a negative balance for the amount they scammed, and the extra for something significantly punitive.
THATS an idea
Pay back EVERYONE that gets scammed with server money, and then force the scammers to pay back the server.
you're welcome
*drops mic walks off stage*-
Informative x 1 - List
-
-
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️So because we help some people we have to take on the near impossible task of helping everyone?
-
matrix_rep Runner Up in BB20Mythic ⚔️ I ⚔️ ECC Sponsor Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐⭐ XI ⭐⭐ Premium UpgradeThis man knows whats he's talking about
-
The problem is that we don't want to spawn in money, because not every player who gets banned for scamming returns, and if they do not return, then the economy is out of balance. We need to use money that is already in the economy if we want to pay back victims. Eventually, this system should be self-sustaining without lotto money, as when scammers return they will need to pay back money to the repayment account that reimburses victims.
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️Liquidate the scammers asserts after 1 month with no appeal.
-
Agree x 2 - List
-
-
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️What about the scammed will they just have to wait an extra month?
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️No, they would receive the money when the complaint is locked and the scammer is banned. They would then receive x amount from the server and when the scammer appeals, they would pay the server. If the scammer does not appeal, their LWC's would be unlocked and all the contents of an equal value as the amount scammed would be destroyed. Does that make more sense?
I still don't agree with it, but if something had to be done, I would prefer this. -
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️So in the case where this suggestion is implimented if someone gets paid by the server that should happen. If so not a bad idea but I still think that belongs in a future suggestion if this one is added.
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️The one me and Dork are suggesting is much better than this one. The burden goes on no one on the server that doesn't want to help. I don't like the idea of a "refund", but, I'd much rather see the one I'm suggesting over this one.
-
UnitedStates2 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium UpgradeThen how come I proposed that yet you said -1?
-
Not sure how it works exactly, but I believe forum etiquette would have you create your own suggestion rather than make one on this one.
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️Nowhere did you suggest that.
-
UnitedStates2 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade
-
UnitedStates2 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade
Also, a lotto tax is somewhat good since lotto contributes nothing to ecc economy unless some random builder just won it when he just joined the server
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️Because I still don't believe a scamming refund is good. I stated that the idea is better than the one that's currently suggested.
Really? That's why around $4.2M is taken out each week from lotto. @Dewsy92 knows the exact amount. But, lotto is a necessity to the economy. So don't throw out "lotto does nothing" without any knowledge of the purpose of lotto. kthxbai -
UnitedStates2 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium UpgradeThen explain to me how lotto helps the economy?
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️When a lottery ticket is bought, $150 is taken out of the economy. We need to take money out of the economy in order to combat the millions of dollars spawned into ECC via /sell. This is the only effective way to combat inflation. Lottery = Needed for a stable economy.
-
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️1. You and dork hasn't really suggested anything you two have presented and idea with no current action plan. What clou has is a suggestion a plan to solve and issue that we currently have. What you and dork have presented is an idea to solve for something else. What you and dork presented isn't nesasarily better than what clou has suggested for 3 reasons 1. They solve for different issues but similar issues so you can't really compare the two. 2. What you guys suggested isn't really a entire plan all you've done is presented an idea. 3. Saying that what you guys suggested is better is entirely subjective and based on your opinion and isn't really based on anything.
Page 19 of 30
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.