Hi there,
I was wondering if it was possible to change the LWC Cleanup Policy so that you don't have to interact with the locks to keep them safe for a few reasons.
1. You can't tell how long a lock has until it's removed, which means it can be hard to keep track of which locks are older. This can lead to people just constantly checking their locks, and for users like me who have a lot of locks (I have 1846) this just isn't realistic.
2. If you have a large amount of locks, chances are you're going to miss some of them and risk having the blocks locked by someone else, or having your goods taken.
I propose that the policy changes so that if you're offline for a certain amount of time, all of your locks will disappear. This means that you lose the thousands and thousands of locks left by old inactive players, and the active players will keep their things and not have to worry about losing all of their things.
Thanks.
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
greenobeano BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️
I don't know if this is possible, but I like it.
+08! -
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
CrazySwagMaster1 Mother F****** SorceressBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
MinecraftParkerH ECC ElonMuskBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ V ⭐ Premium Upgrade
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
How about we have different clean-up times depending on the person? I've got 2 ideas for this.
1. Non-donators get their locks removed quickly, but donators don't get their locks removed as quickly (and maybe a certain donation/donation amount could guarantee the locks never get removed at all)
2. The time it takes to wipe locks could be dependant on how many locks the user has (similar to wiping a users balance). Less than 10 locks could be 2 weeks, 100 could be 3 months, 1000+ would never get wiped etc -
block_crusher Prestige 6, Ex-Ecolegend, $ EcoLeader $Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VI ⭐ Premium Upgrade
- Joined:
- Mar 27, 2012
- Messages:
- 2,894
- Trophy Points:
- 71,660
- Gender:
- Male
- EcoDollars:
- $0
- Ratings:
- +977
-
This. I would like to add to it the following:
Sure a massive database search is a source of lag. but the thing is, every access to this database is what actually causes lag. (Unless the only lag is to the player trying to access the lock, in which case the first half of this statement is irrelevant) and making people constantly interact with their locks will cause more requests.
Step two as has already been mentioned this will remove a LOT more locks in a much more understandable and clear way to the playerbase. It causes way too much fear for no reason when there is another, much more elegant solution -
legendarymoose16 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
+1 This is probably possible and sounds like a good idea, there are plenty of people that have locks they need but don't use often and I think it would be smart to change the policy this way.
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.