Right now sg sucks and is broken. I don't think anyone will argue with me in that there are too many hackers that hide behind buffer and "lag" as well as the pay to win of sg kits. If we removed/reduced awards from sg (say 25 per kill or similar), there will be less incentive to cheat. Hacking/cheating would be trivial and stupid without a reward, and maybe people would kit less since they would realize it's incredibly boring and pointless. I'd love something/anything to be done about sg so throwing this out as a fix/solution. These other options exist but administration will not comment on any, which is sad.
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-massive-revamp-of-kits.115291/
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-restoring-kit-buffer.117352/page-2#post-633377
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-no-kit-sg-arenas.116432/
www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-yet-another-sg-suggestion.117556
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-no-kit-chances.116047/#post-623511
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 1 of 5
-
Vintage_Gamer BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
I have to agree, SG is, to be honest, rubbish at the moment. It needs fixed.. big time.
Anything to revamp sg I am for! -
0TheRedHerring0 PresidentPresident ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐
I totally agree with this suggestion
-
This is one step towards fixing sg but honestly isn't fair for the players who invested in kits. I think it would be much better for everyone if it was completely redone, the way it ought to be. I'd like to see this happen but I can see the main argument showing up is that it is unfair for a few people.
-
-
Agree x 4 - List
-
-
I don't think it would be fair for someone to spend $200 on kits with the sole intention of making money and then have it nerfed.
I do think it would be more fair if someone spent $200 on kits and sg was 10% nerfed.
If mining was 100% nerfed that wouldn't be fair but if it was only 10% nerfed to fight inflation, then I think that'd be more fair to the eff7 owners. I'm also completely avoiding the fact that eff7s can be sold if you are unhappy with them but kits cannot.
Oh let me get something straight too. I'd honestly like to see money removed from sg because it is supposed to be fun but I can see the main argument with this as being unfair for kit owners. However, I'd even more like a complete SG redo because even if money is removed, kits will still run wild and SG will still be broken.-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
Anyways I am highly in favor of this, it will also help get rid of most of the pay2win (sg kits are the only features that directly make lots of money) which will help with new players. -
-1 I am against this idea as I do not believe SG is currently broken nor does it need any removals of its rewards.I feel that a person with sufficient skill will easily be able to kill a kitter,by personal experience.
-
-
Don't forget at the moment that the rewards are doubled. This is only temporary and will go back to normal soon (hopefully!)
-
-
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
greg45865734 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
JoshCraft_FTW The Nubbiest PresidentBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
-
To bad there isn't a way to reduce the awards according to how many kits you use. For example - use no kits get 100% of the reward, use 1 kit get 80% of the reward or something.
I don't remember reading something like this, so if this has been suggested, my bad. -
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
+1
Well needed. -
BuyLowSeIIHigh BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
+1
You know, it's like you have bought into dotcom bubble. It's 2001 and the blue chip market has gained 250% over the last year. You buy in, you make another 250% in half a year, you feel invincible. You go to barbecues and cocktail parties and laugh at 'peasants' who made a mere 25% during that time, because they were careful, and diversified. Suddenly BOOM, next week market pops and you loose 98% of you net value within the next couple of months. There were thousands of guys who faced these consequences in real life. Was that unfair? Ofcourse it is unfair to loose 98% of your net. It was so unfair that many of them could not live with that knowledge anymore. Were they aware that the market was way over bought and fragile - absolutely yes! But they still bought into it.. so who to blame?-
Winner x 1 - List
-
Page 1 of 5
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.