My point was it is a horrible analogy.

I still stand by my point on the amin suggestion.

 

Yeah, however I was referring to knears' "observation" of the American lower class. Yes, many people rich or poor have been scammed irl, which goes against knears' point of saying that scamming restitution has somehow been holding the lower class behind

 

@knears2000 Enlighten me and @_TrueStud13

 

Either way, in real life comparison or not, I still do not agree with this suggestion 1 bit.

 

Good try at @_TrueStud13 but not quite what I was saying.

The government (server) dependency that the lower class has on the government has kept them within the lower class. As @oreo1227 stated, people will automatically assume that they will get their money back no matter what kind of deal they make. Now we make the economic dependency of the player base on the server, and no longer will they feel the need to make "good" deals.

The lower class just came to mind of mine. Make it the upper or middle if you will. But the second you add dependency for restitution of the players to be given out by the server (or the server is needed to do so), you create just more scamming.

I'll state this again, you can't solve scamming from after the fact, it must be done before the transaction even occurs, and I hope no suggestion in the realm of server restitution is ever added for this very reason. No hard feelings, but that's just the way it should be.

*waits for kuke's response*

 

If someone says something offensive to you, and they proceed to say "no offense", it doesn't take away from the fact that they still offended. I suggest you learn from that, no offense. See what I did there?