Minecraft Name: icondigi
Suggestion: My Suggestion is that: If the amount of non kitters is greater then kitters the game automatically goes to a kit free match, the 1/8 chance does not change, however this would be added to give non kit users a chance.
Reason: Many people complain that kits are overpowering and ruin the game which they do, but why dont non kitters stick together and fight for no kit games!
Any Other Information: N/A
Link To This Plugin: N/A
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 1 of 4
-
netherman968 ECC Forum Gold (Just happens to be a mayor)Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
+1 I think if possible, that this suggestion makes a lot of sense, and it would definitely make sg more fair.
-
OlympiansAreGods Building Fanatic SuperModMythic ⚔️ I ⚔️ SuperMod EcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ IV ⭐ Premium Upgrade
YAS! +2000
-
You're right. Sg kits are too much op and people didn't have a chance for win. But a lot of people have pay for get kits to Sg, so it will be a problem and a lot of players will ask the owner for get money back. maybe they can maybe not.
-Agurk20-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
I mean yes Sg kits are really good so nomad players dint have a chance for win. if Sg kits get removed it might be a problem for the owner. The owner have to get all money back to players.
-
I am not stating that SG kits are to be removed. I am stating that if the amount of non kitters in a SG game is higher than the amount of kitters in a SG game, the game automatically goes to "Kit Free" which means kits will not be accessible during that game.
-
Vintage_Gamer BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
Something has to be done about kits, so +1
-
I'm not convinced if I'm honest. It is a new idea though, and its quite interesting..
What would define a non-kitter? Someone with no kits whatsoever? -
weatherryan BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️I think a non kitter would be defined as someone who owns no kits at all beside vsg.
-
Yes, I would like this idea, however most of the time aren't there more kitters than non-kitters in an sg game?
-
@zr2002 - That's exactly what I was thinking of when I asked about the definition of a 'non-kitter' above.
-
Hmm, I just thought of something. I have just normal miq, bfr, and pf. Sometimes when I can't use the kits, I want it to be kit free. So, shouldn't a non-kitter be someone who doesn't have kits available to use at the time?
-
ModernPerils We the NorthBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
Would /kit vsg count? It is technically a kit
-
As weatherryan said
I would only change that if you have no kits available at the time, you are a non kitter for that game -
weatherryan BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️
I would only change that if you have no kits available at the time, you are a non kitter for that game[/QUOTE]
I have to disagree here because this would cause too many kit free games as many users own 1 or 2 regular kits and are kitters even though they can't always use their kits. Also this would make regular kits op bc they would reset with every kit free game.
Page 1 of 4
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.