Eh, this could have many problems with permissions, and it replacing a previous block above you.'however, with the appropriate coding this could be a alright suggestion.

+1

 

This would need a cool down, and it would have to be with a block in your inventory (with the full WE version, it can be anything). It would take playing with, but seeing how much work the devs can do, I don't really doubt anything is possible at this point.

 

+1

 

but that takes some things away from fly now i dont need fly to place blocks but still +1

 

+1

If possible.

 

I agree with this, fly is an expensive feature that many have paid for and this would really cut into that.
-1

 

+1, but make it apart of fly+

 

Explain to me why this is even needed pls.

 

For what? Placing blocks in the air for no reason?

 

But that's why a lot of people get fly to build the air

 

Fly also costs about a third less than this.

 

I'd use it for things I needed that were floating.

For example, if I want to build a plane, usually I start by building a tower up to place the lowest block, then breaking the tower other than the block. I would then finish the plane, with fly, from that one block.

I have to be honest though, I don't think it's really practical to use this to build whole structures. It would take longer to calculate the distance and build an entire thing for a user without fly this way, then actually placing the blocks. That's why I also suggested a cool down -- this doesn't seem like it should be //up's intended purpose.

 

instead of //up wouldn't it be better if it's a command that simply placed a block beneath where you're standing? You can fly up, and then use the command to place a block beneath your feet.

 

I feel that would be hard if not +1

 

Pretty much the only point I see. But honestly, making a dirt pillar is not that hard.
-1

 

Neither is placing a crafting table, but still /wb is a command people simply can't live without.