Minecraft Name:
zr2002
Suggestion:
I am suggesting to change the Section 5 - Towns, Nations and Property
Clause 3 - Seizure of Property & 3 Day Eviction Notices rule
It currently states this:
- By owning the town, a town Mayor has the right to remove you from the town at any time, for any reason, so long as the Mayor gives the user a 3 day eviction notice.
- An eviction notice may be given by in-game (either by PM or /mail) or by tagging evicted users in a thread in the Town Evicitions sub-forum within the Towns Discussion forum. It is not required to post a thread for any eviction, although it may be easier if you are evicting multiple users.
- The eviction notice must contain the name of the town. Be sure to collect evidence of this for LWC Removal Requests and/or proof should it be required at a later date. It is crucial that the screenshot has a timestamp (double tap f2).
- If the user being evicted has LWCs in the town and the Mayor intends to file an LWC Request to have them removed, the eviction notice must include a specific request that the user removes their locks within the 3 days.
- The evicted user must have had the opportunity to view the eviction notice. If the user has not been online, in-game or on the forums depending on how the eviction notice was issued, during the 3 day period then the eviction is not valid. The mayor or co-mayor must wait until the user is inactive (at least 7 days offline) or has been online to view to the notice before removing the user from the town or filing an LWC Removal Request.
- Only the Official Owner or the Legal Owner of the town may evict players who are region owners/co-mayors.
- However, under the following circumstances, the 3 day eviction criteria need not be met and the user may be removed from the town:
- A user is inactive (by staff standards, this means at least 7 days offline.)
- A user who has been banned for griefing in the town or warned by a staff member as a result of a Grief Report.
I am suggesting to add a line under where the 3 day eviction criteria doesn't have to be met:
EDIT: Could also be what @Nicit6 said:
- By owning the town, a town Mayor has the right to remove you from the town at any time, for any reason, so long as the Mayor gives the user a 3 day eviction notice.
- An eviction notice may be given by in-game (either by PM or /mail) or by tagging evicted users in a thread in the Town Evicitions sub-forum within the Towns Discussion forum. It is not required to post a thread for any eviction, although it may be easier if you are evicting multiple users.
- The eviction notice must contain the name of the town. Be sure to collect evidence of this for LWC Removal Requests and/or proof should it be required at a later date. It is crucial that the screenshot has a timestamp (double tap f2).
- If the user being evicted has LWCs in the town and the Mayor intends to file an LWC Request to have them removed, the eviction notice must include a specific request that the user removes their locks within the 3 days.
- The evicted user must have had the opportunity to view the eviction notice. If the user has not been online, in-game or on the forums depending on how the eviction notice was issued, during the 3 day period then the eviction is not valid. The mayor or co-mayor must wait until the user is inactive (at least 7 days offline) or has been online to view to the notice before removing the user from the town or filing an LWC Removal Request.
- Only the Official Owner or the Legal Owner of the town may evict players who are region owners/co-mayors.
- However, under the following circumstances, the 3 day eviction criteria need not be met and the user may be removed from the town:
- A user is inactive (by staff standards, this means at least 7 days offline.)
- A user who has been banned for griefing in the town or warned by a staff member as a result of a Grief Report.
- A user who is a staff member in a player-run casino and is banned/warned for attempted scamming/scamming.
- Players added to a region for a specific job upon completion of work or termination of employment.
Reason:
Recently there have been a few reports on attempted scamming in the casino, and after speaking with staff, have determined that the user cannot be removed from the region in a player-run casino for attempted scamming if they had bought perms for money. The only way you would be able to remove/fire them is if you had an agreement saying if the player scams/attempts to scam, they will be fired.
Other Information:
N/A
Link to this plugin:
Wiki
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
OtterInAOnesie Owner of Otter FarmsPresident ⛰️⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
+1
Sent from my VS876 using Tapatalk -
I personally think that while I like the idea behind the rule, the applications of that specific rule are limited.
I would highly prefer a rule stating along the lines of:
- Players added to a region for a specific job upon completion of work or termination of employment.
I meant to discuss this with Dews anyway so *cough cough* @Dewsy92-
Agree x 2 - List
-
a18greek18 Former EcoLeaderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
- Joined:
- Jun 19, 2012
- Messages:
- 2,412
- Trophy Points:
- 53,260
- Gender:
- Male
- EcoDollars:
- $52,000
- Ratings:
- +1,400
A much needed rule to be added.
-
SuburbSomeone Shrubby TycoonBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
- Joined:
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages:
- 3,301
- Trophy Points:
- 78,090
- Gender:
- Male
- EcoDollars:
- $0
- Ratings:
- +6,465
Many bumps, but this is a good idea. Definitely would like to see Nicit's version of this suggestion.
-
tumblemaster BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
I agree. The rules should definitely reflect this.
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.