[User Complaint] @jordan319

Accused Username:

@jordan319​

Complaint:

Use of a hacked client within Survival Games.​

Evidence:

​

Additional Information:

Aimbot and critical hits occur often at critical points in the battle at the very least. Moreover, the user does not have buffer and seems to only have spy and a smaller sword kit at his disposal. Coupled with his inconsistent gameplay that ranges from below-average accuracy to perfect aim, many within the SG community has shown similar suspicion that this user is using a form of hacked client.

Here is extensive video evidence from three days recording to document the actions of this player, and I welcome any additional video evidence within a relevant comment, as I understand there to be several players who stated they would also be recording him. Hacking within Survival Games is the highest offense to the EcoCityCraft pvp community, and I lend my findings to the staff for their verdict.​

 

I went ahead and editted my videos to be more helpful to the staff and offer the claims and sources of my findings.

In reply to Jordan, while I'm happy to listen to hear any explanation or side to your story, the fact is an irrelevant and sarcastic explanation of how to perform a critical hit leads one to believe you are downplaying what is reasonable evidence (presented in #4 & #5) of the use of Criticals through a hacked client. Moreover, instead of worrying about that, I would be much more worried about the rampant use of aimbot that is suspected of you in almost all of these videos and is far easier to identify. You should know your inconsistent gameplay has been the subject of much discussion within the SG circles, and to the more experienced player, it is fairly easy to distinguish what is legitimate inconsistency that we all struggle with from time-to-time from what appears to be the on-and-off use of a hacked client via hotkey. And lastly, given the complete absence of virtually any lag as of late, I call your bluff as to me being unable to see what you see.

Here is a final elaboration of my evidence to be reviewed by the community and the staff team as they should please.
[All videos shortened to the scene under suspicion and replayed at 1/4th speed for frame-by-frame analysis]



Evidence #1
Aimbot
Reach



While not as conclusive as many of the other pieces of evidence, this piece of evidence seems to have the makings of hotkey-based aimbot, first originating as soon as I land my second hit and he falls back a little in the sand, and being turned off after a brief stint when the user double-hits me in the air, and proceeds to kill me at 3 remaining hearts. Reach extension (normally 3 blocks) seems very possible here given the nature of the double attack when I was outside of sword range after the second hit ( I was approximately 5 blocks at a diagonal).

Evidence #2
Aimbot



Not much to say here, but there are two primary examples I'd like to point to. The first being when I jump on top the dirt and leap over the two users and the fact that the user-in-question's head follows my exact arc. Even the video frame as we go into the final level of deathmatch shows him still looking perfectly at me though he is running at across from where I was. The second part are the sheer number of hits he lands where he is not even close to looking at me. Lag presents a problem often enough, but I experienced absolutely none, and there is no explanation how the second part of dm he lands about half of his attacks without even looking at me.

Evidence #3
Aimbot



To be noted, I had no buffer within this battle. However, I counted only two hits caught within the frame where you were actually looking at me: and both being part of a single double hit. Nothing in this battle seemed consistent, as I believe he to have used a hotkey-based aimbot at the point where he begins tracking me with double hits and then turning it off when I am at a half-heart.

Evidence #4
Aimbot
Criticals



Given he has no buffer and a wooden sword, this should be impossible. Next to perfectly tracking my motion after each consecutive hit, the user uses only three attacks to defeat me despite the following information.

My Armor = -32% Attack Damage
Your Sword = 5 Attack Damage (With Crit. Hit = 7.5 Attack Damage)

And given that only one critical attack took place (all of his attacks were viewed within frame and only the first emitted crit. sparks), that would mean he could have only had a max damage with three hits of 7.5 (crits ignore armor) + 3.4(2) = 14.3 Attack D out of the 20 Attack D needed to kill me. With Critical hacks however, this can be accomplished in only three hits as viewed in the video and render a damage total of 22.5 Attack D.

Evidence #5
Criticals
Possibility of Anti-Knockback



This is an interesting piece of evidence, in that the stone slab you walked over may have allowed for you to implement a critical hit without jumping, which would nullify it as a piece of evidence. But the fact that you took only two swings without buffer to kill me with an iron sword in an environment where I suffered no gameplay lag is what I find extremely dubious based on these notes.

My Armor = -32% Attack Damage
Your Sword = 7 Attack Damage (With Crit. Hit = 10.5 Attack Damage)

Accounting for at least one critical hit out of the two hits you inflicted, the absolute most you should have been able to have dealt in only two blows is 10.5 (crits ignore armor) + 4.76 = 15.26 Attack D out of the 20 Attack D needed to kill a player. On the other hand, if you were using criticals within a hacked client, it would have only taken a mere two hits (yielding 21 Attack D) to down a player with my armor with an iron sword.

Also, the user took no knockback whatsoever within the melee (which should have yielded a standard -2.6 block sword knockback), though I do not know if aerial attacks affect in anyway a user's ability to be knockbacked.

--------------------------

Please review my evidence, I reviewed my damage sources for Evidences #4 and #5 via Minecraft Wiki (http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Damage) and would like any of my facts to be noted if incorrect.

I rest my case.

 

Even with my complaint up, this user has spent the majority of this evening using aimbot on a hotkey. Watch his head the entire time we're in the heat of battle; he never looks away from me. Pay special attention #7. There is absolutely no way in heck he could have damaged half my health without even looking at me. This user is absolutely illegitimate and I petition the SG community to share their videos, as at least three people stated they would be recording him.

Evidence #6



Evidence #7



Evidence #8

 

I have two more videos that I'm debating if I should load, but I don't want to overwhelm the mods by the sheer numbers that have already been posted. This is outrageous that even while a complaint is up about he using a hacked client, he would still be using it to grasp every last available amount of money from the Survival Games before he is possibly banned. I will be patient, and I trust the staff to act justly and fairly on the matter.

 

Awesome, #6 and #8 are legit then, I'm glad to hear. But what's up with 7 though, you weren't even faced my direction within the video and managed to damage half my health?

 

Fair enough, I agree, excellent points.

 

I wasn't being sarcastic, I really did mean it and I honestly don't want to see an evidently talented player like you get banned. Great point, about the knockback, and I just hope the original videos are legit as well