[Ban Appeal] Dufflemax

Discussion in 'Ban Appeal Archive' started by Dufflemax, Aug 21, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dufflemax

    Dufflemax Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Builder ⚒️

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    7,095
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2
    In Game Name:
    Dufflemax
    Have you changed your Minecraft username since being banned? If so, what is your previous name:
    no
    Which of ECC's services are you banned on:
    Probs all idk
    Reason of Ban:
    Calling zevzero a [mod-edit]
    Rule Violated:
    Trolling
    Please explain in your own words what the rule(s) means:
    Trolling its fairly obvious
    Reason you feel you think you should be un-banned:
    1. I didn't get the required amount of warnings 2. He is a [mod-edit] so therefore I was only telling the truth 3. What kind of a name is zevzero
     
    • Potato Potato x 5
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • List
    #1 Dufflemax, Aug 21, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2017
  2. UnitedStates2

    UnitedStates2 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,883
    Trophy Points:
    67,660
    Ratings:
    +6,302
    @Dufflemax

    You don't need to reach 7/7 warnings to get a ban or tempban. In fact, the vast majority of users who get banned on this server don't even reach 7/7 warnings. All that matters is whether or not staff consider the rule-breaking in question ban-worthy, which in this case, we did.

    And these posts tell me you aren't taking the process seriously, which really doesn't help your case under any circumstances.

    Regardless, tempbans aren't appealable. You'll simply have to wait this one out. While you're waiting your tempban out, however, I would recommend you read and familiarize yourself with the rules, which can be found here - That way you can follow them and avoid a situation like this again.

    Locked.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.