In Game Name: xHarambaeWhat part of EcoCityCraft is this suggestion for: All Main ServersShort title for your suggestion: Addition of God ToolsWhat are you suggesting: I am suggesting a new application for God Tools where you trade 1 double chest for an ECC/Magic Tool.Why is this a good addition for EcoCityCraft?: I believe this would be a great addition to the economy as the Star/God Tool market is in dire need of a boost. Due to the mass influx of Nether Stars and ECD from GodKeys; the market has crashed tremendoulsy. I believe this will increase the value of God Tools since there will be an increase urge of obtaining 54 God Tools of whatever certain to earn that respective ECC/Magic Tool.Other information: For instance, if prices of God Tools went back up to $2.5mil ecd/each from the server, then 1 double chest of a certain God Tool could be $135,000,000 taken out of the econonmy.Plugin or custom addition: N/AOne suggestion per form: I Understand.
-1, Sure itll fix the prices of nstars/star tools at first, but then the prices on ECC tools go down, and all of a sudden the norm is to make 100k+ an hour.
God tools go for around a million(depending on the tool really), but how did you get to 2 billion? 54 slots in a double chest and tools are not stackable? For the suggestion, however, we've had similar suggestions denied. I'm unsure on this idea as a whole, because this would increase the amount of OP tools in the market, still causing inflation. Also, I think some details would need to be worked out, such as if this would be done through an application or another way, and do you get to choose your ECC/Magic tool or is it random? As of now I'm neutral on this idea so +/-0
For that to be the "norm" it means everyone already has 50+ god tools to trade in. Doesn't seem realistic to me.
Id +1 if it was “trade in 10 (or some amount) for a god drop spin.” Or “5 for a god key” I dont think we should have magic tools be something that can be traded in and have it relatively “random” as to who gets it.
Will be denying this as we've just introduced a major change to ECC. I'd like to see how things play out first before moving forward with more changes to these tools.
