In Game Name: xOSneakyNinjaoxWhat part of EcoCityCraft is this suggestion for: Main ServerShort title for your suggestion: Reduce cooldown for trade requestsWhat are you suggesting: I think that the cooldown between sending another user a trade request should be reduced, by atleast 2-3 seconds. At the moment I feel that the time between sending the same user a trade request is simply too long. This gets especially annoying when doing an e-repair for someone, you send the inital trade request then repair the tool, repairing the tool for experienced users with Macros or Powertools, takes less than a second, after repairing the tool, you then send the trade request again, but 95% of the time you're hit with the message "You are not allowed to spam trade requests". You then end up waiting at least a few more seconds waiting for the cooldown to finish. Although this is only a few seconds of waiting, its more annoying than anything, and there has been times where I thought the trade request had gone through succesfully, when infact it hadn't.Why is this a good addition for EcoCityCraft?: It's only a small change, that for some users, it would remove the slight annoyance of waiting around to give a tool back after a erep.Other information: N/APlugin or custom addition: Trade systemOne suggestion per form: I Understand.
Has happened to me countless times and it's very awkward to have happen thinking its gone through / believing you're waiting on them to accept it, then they message back asking "You gonna trade it back?" / "You finished yet?", only to realize it was on cd and never sent. Huge +1 from me.
I use pt repairs. Never ran into the cool down issue, but I mostly see newbie requests so they respond slow enough that the whole time to get the items exceeds the cool down. 0 no plus or minus
I would love to make this happen. Just looked through the config for the plugin and it's literally not possible lmao. Unless I'm trippin (https://www.spigotmc.org/resources/safetrade.13885/) Obviously not going to maintain a custom branch of the plugin for a small change like this sadly I've asked the developer in the thread if it's possible though, and if so, I'll definitely do it. For now marking denied because, well shit lol.
