Minecraft Name: matrix_rep Suggestion: assign 3 members to the "hacking catching team that are on staff" Those staff members main purpose on staff will be to deal with hacking complaints. A team of 3 allows for 2 yes's or 2 no's its simple not corrupt and should be an easy fix Reason: Lets me honest hacking complaints take WAY too long to handle. Im not blaming the staff system rather criticizing its efficiency. I am sure ever staff member has to vote on these complaints (probably game admin and higher) and it may not even be a majority, instead all members have to vote yes, to ban, in a unanimous decision. What i just recently said may be incorrect but as an ecc member of the community that is what seems like happens. Again I am not saying this method is bad, but it needs to be altered. The main reason for this is because while this staff hacking team of probably 9 members are viewing these complaints as a non priority, meaning not the first thing they think of, those that can possible be hacking are hurting the economy and are ruining the game play of other users. Any Other Information: Not really Link To This Plugin: i never know
+1 this would take hacking complaints alot less time to be delt with and the hackers wouldnt interfere with people who dont hack for a longer time
This is already a thing. It's just a matter of organizing all of the complaints, and a few people need to be on board for a ban before one is given.
I know its a thing but this has been the case since @UnknownRider left i am simply trying to create a better efficiency for the hacking catching team.
+1 This is brilliant, and I agree matrix, it seems like hacking complaints take way to long to be delt with, I highly dislike when there is a hacking complaint on someone that was for say, a week ago, and then a week later no decision has been made yet and that user is still playing sg and hacking and taking money from other sg players.
You're saying that members of this hacking team haven't been on in the past week, haven't been able to take a couple of minutes to review the evidence, and haven't been able to leave their opinion in a pm? Please tell me why it takes more than the time for a normal complaint.
Because it takes a matter of a few opinions, along with the case of having everyone responsible for watching on board for the decision. We don't make decisions unless we're all convinced.
@Dccciz im saying that it takes awhile for the staff hacking team as a group to make a decision while the guy who is possibly hacking is still playing sg and taking money from other player who aren't using hacks.
+1 It will help track on hacker's attempt and their antics to exploit the server by the anti-hacking group's stealth means of watching (like "spectator" mode)
Everything about the process is very detail oriented and we make sure to look at every little bit before even giving our opinions out. Also keep in mind Staff are also busy being Staff and are not able to handle it "right here right now", let alone the fact of needing several opinions and that many of us are in different timezones.
Lol. http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/user-complaint-ilikepiehaha.114083/ - open 1 month http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/user-complaint-pizza520.112643/ - open 1 month http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/user-complaint-craftychips.89257/ - open 1 month http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/user-complaint-craftychips.89308/ - open about 1 month
2 of those are over a year old and were handled by a hacking team that consisted of 2 people...you're literally arguing against the suggestion by posting them.
Hmm, well if those were handled by a "hacking team", then i'd guess this suggestion isn't necessary and would only make things less efficient. However, what about the ilikepiehaha, and pizza520 ones which happened in November/December?
The team working on them then is fairly different than now, and as you can see by the older ones you posted, a smaller team (the suggestion) did not help them get handled quicker. You're also highly picking and choosing what are probably statistical outliers, not actual averages.
