Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools

Thread Tools

  1. ScopicX Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    36,290
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +852
    Minecraft Name: imSwag__

    Suggestion: Allow people to get towns without ranking up

    Reason:     I've seen many people staying Builder or resident or mayor, because they do not like the looks of the rank above them (E.X: President is ugly). If this is implemented, then Residents & Mayors could buy additional towns WITHOUT ranking up.

    To put it short and simple: Add a "Buy an Additional town" option in the Resident+ Section.

    Any Other Information:     Nope

    Link To This Plugin/Is this a custom addition?:     It's all up to the SA team
     
    #1 ScopicX, Jul 14, 2016
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2016

  2. Reincarnated_ Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Messages:
    619
    Trophy Points:
    38,840
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,330
    This is already possible you know... many residents would love to be mayor but don't care for the town. Just pay 80k, they get mayor and you get their town. Life isn't always 1 press of a button. Sometimes you have to interact with new players :p
     
    #2 Reincarnated_, Jul 14, 2016

  3. ScopicX Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    36,290
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +852
    I am aware of that. I may have worded the thread wrong. I meant become the Original owner of the town, likewise to purchasing Additional towns (President+)

    You may (or may not) have noticed that buying a Resident > mayor for their town has its risks, and, if the newly promoted mayor quits the server, then you cannot apply for any new town features.

    Sorry if I made my suggestion misleading.
     
    #3 ScopicX, Jul 14, 2016
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2016

  4. Blizzard_04 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 21, 2016
    Messages:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    42,760
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +97
    +1
     
    #4 Blizzard_04, Jul 14, 2016

  5. Expipiplusone Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Messages:
    1,591
    Trophy Points:
    47,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +774
    I fail to see why anyone would pay 85k to get their first town but not the rank, when with the same amount they could get both. If you don't care for the rank, it doesn't make any difference for you. And if you care, why would you care against the rank? What's wrong with their look? Just the color in chat?
     
    #5 Expipiplusone, Jul 14, 2016

  6. ScopicX Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    36,290
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +852
    @Expipiplusone I'll change my wording. I meant to allow Residents & Mayors to buy "additional" towns, as the only way to do that right now is to be President+.

    So I'm pretty much suggesting for an option to "Purchase an (Additional) Town" in the Resident+ section, so all Residents and above can get this feature.
     
    #6 ScopicX, Jul 14, 2016

  7. Expipiplusone Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Messages:
    1,591
    Trophy Points:
    47,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +774
    But the whole point of the "Mayor" rank is that you get one town, and the whole point of the "President" rank is that you create a nation with more than one town. The names are not casual. It just doesn't make any sense to separate the perks from the ranks.
    If you have a problem just with the appearance of the [Mayor] or the [President] tag, why don't you just suggest that you could edit it somehow, instead of making a pointless distinction between the ranks and the perks associated?
     
    #7 Expipiplusone, Jul 15, 2016
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2016

  8. TheBuckeye11 Mayor
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    710
    Trophy Points:
    32,360
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +184
    Why -AReallyBigNumber
     
    #8 TheBuckeye11, Jul 15, 2016

  9. 314 Irrational GameAdmin, former ServerAdmin
    EcoLegend ⛰️⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Prestige ⭐ VI ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    7,219
    Trophy Points:
    101,160
    EcoDollars:
    $5,647,152
    Ratings:
    +4,919
    Exactly.
     
    #9 314, Jul 15, 2016

  10. kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯ
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,051
    Trophy Points:
    99,160
    Ratings:
    +6,910
    If residents decide not to become mayor, that's fine. But you won't get any towns without mayor. That completely gets rid of the point of ranking up.
     
    #10 kukelekuuk, Jul 15, 2016

  11. ScopicX Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,233
    Trophy Points:
    36,290
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +852
    You guys do have a point, I simply thought having this feature avaliable to Residents & Mayors would be cool. I'll wait for the admins to deny this then, or lock it, whichever comes first.
     
    #11 ScopicX, Jul 15, 2016

  12. Nicit6 N6
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ II ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    9,915
    Trophy Points:
    106,160
    Ratings:
    +8,040
    The system isn't meant for residents to officially own towns or mayors to own two. Look at all the town features, they're Mayor+. Multi-town features are Pres+. Residents can't even add or remove owners to towns.

    Not happening.
     
    #12 Nicit6, Jul 15, 2016
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.