@Mr_Doom_Bringer
Firstly, I would like to thank you for posting so much evidence on this user. I was going to post a complaint myself.
I have something that is sufficient enough to be posting here.
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/can-has-medal.108183/
All over this thread, this user has been trolling. This user know's and agreed to the rules when they became resident.
I hope this helps prove a point.

 

Thanks SO much. Finally someone took action for fourm spam/troll

 

http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-parkour-world.107656/page-2

^ I don't know if this helps. But is shows he's just arguing for the sake of arguing with people and purposely criticizing them to get them to respond. I dont know if this is really enough to be considered a troll or flame, but if its not some of the links above and the example below are threads necroed by the player and that is also against the rules.

-example-
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-bows-in-sg.103929/

This is necroing because of a warning issued today by a staff member here shows nercoing in the exact same time span. Both above and below are necro form aug18.

-necro warning-
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-rule-change.63800/page-7

sorry for posting if this is irrelevant.

 

You don't have the right to claim I'm just arguing for the sake of arguing. I wrote criticism on a suggestion and I was attacked for it. After which I defended my argument.

I didn't necro any thread, those threads were still relevant and no older than 2 weeks.


As for the rest of the posts Mr_Doom was linking. I gave my opinion in a sarcastic manner on suggestions I didn't like. The suggestions I did like I left alone. I'm not just doing this because I'm a so called "troll" I'm doing this because I prefer sarcasm over regular arguments. (It seems to get my point across better)

As for what loganeric linked, it was a joke... I apologize if it bothered anyone..

The only one I truly broke a rule in was the very first one mr_doom linked. I crossed a line there. I apologize for that.

 

Uh, no. Let's take the link in which you stated "savepay2win". What the hell is that? You're arguing, for the sake of arguing, adding nothing new to the discussion, and yes, the thread was over two weeks old. You're reopening the thread to flame, like you have on every other damn post.

Sarcasm is hands down the lamest excuse I've ever heard. "I'm gonna be an a-hole and post sarcastically on this thread". Who does that? No one. If you disagree, give construct criticism, not sarcasm. If the President said that he didn't like someone sarcastically, what would happen to him? He'd be literally killed because of his actions. Think before you post. I rest my case.

 

"savepay2win" was an ironic statement referring to the fact that pay2win is rampaging in this server.

I disagreed, and used sarcasm. I fail to see how that's breaking the rules. Does it say somewhere that I'm not allowed to use sarcasm?

Comparing me to the president? I'm honored. But my actions don't have the same impact as the president's actions. Think before you compare. I rest my case.

 

Doing it once isn't breaking the rules, doing it on every thread you find for no point is.

 

Who are you to decide there was no point? I conveyed my point using sarcasm and irony. That's not breaking the rules.

 

Hello,
Thank you for reporting this.
However, before the time of this posting, I did forum pm the user regarding the thread that loganeric pointed out, along with the pointless forum spam that went on.
I hope @bigboompanda123 will remember what I said and doesnt repeat the same actions again. Thank you!

Locked.