Accused Username:
Niklaniesen2002Complaint:
Scamming my eff7Evidence:
Additional Information:
here is all the information i can give you about the scamming of my first eff7 on the server.
My first complaint on him was this one http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/scamming.72930/
Now back to the main point he scammed me out of an eff7 ctoolme out of 100k+ in donations and was not forced to pay back due to his account being compromised now i understand it was hacked but everytime someone says that mods say "your account your responsibility" why was this case different?
Here is his ban appeal for the first scamming offense:http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/ban-appeal.73106/
This pretty much sums everything up http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/eff-7-scam.88554/
I understand if this does not get over ruled but after his recent appeal it would upset me if he got unbanned without having to fix all of his wrongs his account his responsibility, he scammed normal users was not forced to payback then he got hacked again and scammed ex staff and was forced to pay them back it seems biased
Thank you for reviewing this
This was a message sent to past sa's like two years ago i tweaked it but it explains it well it was going to be reviewed but they got perma'd not saying names :p
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
XNinjaXSteveX BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️
-
ClarinetPhoenix She does what she wants.Owner Events Manager ECC Sponsor Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ IX ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade Wiki Leader
Even if we decided to change the ruling on this complaint. The user is still banned and has been for almost 3 years. Not perma'd though. They can still appeal. It wouldn't really accomplish anything in your favor to punish this user for this. You wouldn't ever get anything back unless the user were to return to ECC.
Anyway...
He was never held accountable for the eff7 and was never banned for it. Therefore there is no current debt to you to punish this user for. This complaint will be dismissed under the grounds that this situation is unchanged and handled(as of like 3 years ago).
I'm not really a fan of pinning random debt on users, especially since it was ruled that he would not be held responsible for it due to the situation in the past.
Dismissed-
Agree x 1 -
Potato x 1 - List
-
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.