Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jdawger Goes by Brass Scribe everwhere except MC & ECC
    ECC Sponsor EcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VII ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    92,160
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,520
    In Game Name:
    Jdawger
    What part of EcoCityCraft is this suggestion for:
    All Main Servers
    Short title for your suggestion:
    Trading God Tool for Star Tool Option
    What are you suggesting:
    A buy sign at Star Shop that gives players the option to trade their God tool for their Star Tool variant.
    Why is this a good addition for EcoCityCraft?:
    Some people don't like the lore on their tools, and a way to remove the lore would be nice. Plus, God Tools and Star Tools are exactly the same in terms of making money, so it won't hurt the economy.
    Other information:

    Plugin or custom addition:

    One suggestion per form:
    I Understand.
     
  2. Nicit6 N6
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ II ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    9,915
    Trophy Points:
    106,160
    Ratings:
    +8,040
    This seems like it would take up a lot of real estate at spawn with really no tangible benefit.
     
    • Optimistic x 1
    • List
  3. Jdawger Goes by Brass Scribe everwhere except MC & ECC
    ECC Sponsor EcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VII ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    92,160
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3,520
    Not at all. There are only 10 god tools, and there is a whole empty wall at starshop where the transfer sword stuff used to be. We would only need like 10 signs
     
    #3 Jdawger, Nov 13, 2020
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2020
  4. Founder Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    20,834
    Trophy Points:
    121,160
    Ratings:
    +15,219
    This would require custom coding, and I genuinely don't see any reason to add this (cosmetic preference feature) to our development todo list (which is already packed).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.